Actually, it’s 5 4 10 12 2 9 8 11 6 7 3 1 for me, but too lazy to edit the image

  • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    88
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Which language provides the most random alphabetically sorted sequence?

    Data
    |  N | Eng | Dut | Ger | Tur | Chi | Lex |
    |----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
    |  1 |   8 |   8 |   8 |   6 |   8 |   1 |
    |  2 |  11 |   3 |   3 |   5 |   2 |  10 |
    |  3 |   5 |   1 |   1 |   1 |   9 |  11 |
    |  4 |   4 |  11 |  11 |   9 |   6 |  12 |
    |  5 |   9 |   9 |   5 |   4 |   3 |   2 |
    |  6 |   1 |  10 |   9 |   2 |   4 |   3 |
    |  7 |   7 |  12 |   6 |  10 |   7 |   4 |
    |  8 |   6 |   2 |   7 |  11 |  10 |   5 |
    |  9 |  10 |   4 |   4 |  12 |  12 |   6 |
    | 10 |   3 |   5 |  10 |   8 |  11 |   7 |
    | 11 |  12 |   6 |   2 |   3 |   5 |   8 |
    | 12 |   2 |   7 |  12 |   7 |   1 |   9 |
    

    Sourced from comments in thread (English from image, Dutch from !Vinny_93@lemmy.world, German from !TJA@sh.itjust.works , Turkish from some rando, Chinese from !idealotus@lemmy.world, Lexicographical from !monogram@feddit.nl)

    Plot with Correlation Scores

    We will compute the pearson correlation (r-statistic) score by comparing the base number (column 1) with the corresponding language column. We will also compute the Serial correlation, by creating staggered columns that measure how close a number is in a sequence to the one before it.

    Staggered Table
    cat alphabetic.tab \
        | awk '{print $0"\t"prE"\t"prD"\t"prG"\t"prT"\t"prC"\t"prL;prE=$2;prD=$3;prG=$4;prT=$5;prC=$6;prL=$7}' \
        | tee alphabetic.tab.stagger
    
    Plot Code
    gnuplot -p -e '
      set xlabel "Base Sequence";
      set ylabel "Alphabetic";
      set xtics 1,1,12;
      set ytics 1,1,12;
      set title "Alphabetic Number Plot with Correlation Score";
      set rmargin 25; set key at graph 1.5,0.9;
      set size ratio 0.45;
    
      stats "alphabetic.tab.stagger" using 1:2 name "E";
      stats "" using 1:3 name "D";
      stats "" using 1:4 name "G";
      stats "" using 1:5 name "T";
      stats "" using 1:6 name "C";
      stats "" using 1:7 name "L";
      
      stats "" using 2:8 name "ES";
      stats "" using 3:9 name "DS";
      stats "" using 4:10 name "GS";
      stats "" using 5:11 name "TS";
      stats "" using 6:12 name "CS";
      stats "" using 7:13 name "LS";
    
      set label 1 sprintf("%10s  %6s  %6s", "", "Base", "Stagger") at graph 1.07,0.95;
    
      plot "" using 1:2 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "English", E_correlation, ES_correlation),
           "" using 1:3 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Dutch", D_correlation, DS_correlation),
           "" using 1:4 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "German", G_correlation, GS_correlation),
           "" using 1:5 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Turkish", T_correlation, TS_correlation),
           "" using 1:6 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Chinese", C_correlation, CS_correlation),
           "" using 1:7 with lines lw 1 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Lexicon", L_correlation, LS_correlation)
    '
    

    It looks like Dutch has the lowest (near 0) correlation to both the base sequence and it’s own staggered sequence, with Turkish mirroring it’s staggered randomness somewhat.

    The least random alphabetic sequences are English and German.


    Updated: Added chinese and staggered analysis.

  • @vrojak@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    387 days ago

    I recently found out that javascript’s .sort() function, when called without arguments on an array of numbers, converts them all to strings and sorts them alphabetically 🤡

    • @ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      167 days ago

      I’m a C programmer. My first time writing Javascript and ran into some sort of bug involving a === sign or something. Javascript is a silly language.

        • @FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          77 days ago

          The epitomy of irony is a JavaScript developer insisting that some other language is “a fractal of bad design” without immediately acknowledging that JS is weird as hell.

          • Die Martin DieOP
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I like Lua’s design. Separate addition (x+y) and concatenation (x..y) operators ftw!

            Edit: and just, like, everything else about Lua too

      • @humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Javascript lets you compare unlike types without extra steps using ==. If you want strict comparison where “2” isn’t 2, use === and !==. Personally, I find that easier than having to parseint or cast every damn thing or whatever c does (strtol?). That said, I have build tools set up to enforce strict comparison because I don’t trust myself or others.

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 days ago

        I’m stupid and read the clock wrong and didn’t check even a little.

  • cally [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67 days ago

    Portuguese

    cinco, dez, dois, doze, nove, oito, onze, quatro, seis, sete, três, um

    5 10 2 12 9 8 11 4 6 7 3 1

    cinco, dez, dois, doze, meia, nove, oito, onze, quatro, sete, três, um

    5 10 2 12 6 9 8 11 4 7 3 1

    (six can be “seis” or “meia”)

    • Die Martin DieOP
      link
      fedilink
      57 days ago

      Mine is Spanish

      Cinco (5), cuatro (4), diez (10), doce (12), dos (2), nueve (9), ocho (8), once (11), seis (6), siete (7), tres (3), una (1)

  • Noxy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 days ago

    If a mechanical clock or watch was like that it would be one hell of a fascinating movement