• @scintilla@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 hours ago

      I had to turn off privacy badger and ublock for it to not be slow. It’s stupid I’m paying for the service to be ad free it should be ad free without complaints.

  • Frenchfryenjoyer (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    397 hours ago

    A wild YouTube appeared!

    Go, uBlock Origin!

    Wild YouTube used Throttle!

    It’s not very effective…

    uBlock Origin used Evolve!

    It’s super effective!

    YouTube fainted!

  • @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    357 hours ago

    I watched videos on Newgrounds using dial-up

    They are going to have to slow ad blockers by a lot for me to consider it slow

    • mesaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      187 hours ago

      My wife and I were discussing this. This isnt “slow” to us, its just a tiny bit inconvenient. We were used to the old AOL pictures taking a good minute or two to load.

      We would get rid of Youtube before we get ads.

  • @Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    66 hours ago

    Then I suppose it’s a good thing they’re limiting non-premium users from using the “high bitrate” quality options?

    ^ that was sarcasm. HARSH sarcasm. With both middle fingers pointing toward a Google logo and spitting.

    • dil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 hour ago

      yeah I had some blender visuals I made that only look good high quality because of the detail and it looks sick as my desktop wallpaper with hidamsri but horrible and blurry viewing it on youtube at the highest quality

  • @phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 hours ago

    That’s a relief. I’ve been dreading the day when they introduce server-side adsm but it seems we’re not there yet 😅 I’m not sure what they think they’ll accomplish with this when it’s A LOT less painful than turning off your adblocker and dealing with the ads, though. Maybe they’re just trying random things to see what works.

  • @buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 hours ago

    I’m curious what people would prefer for revenue generation models. Just subscription fees? A lot of folks also seem resistant to that as well.

    • Coil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 hours ago

      There was a time where they only used banner ads. Or ads before the video and not in the middle. Honestly, if they had a cheap, no frills ad free sub, I’d pay for it.

    • @poloqualle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 hours ago

      I would happily pay for yt premium, if that also meant that google does not violate my privacy and sell my data.

      • @Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 hours ago

        That’s my problem, you have to be logged in if you pay and that’s just more data for them to suck up. I watch not logged in. If I want to comment I use a different device.

    • @surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 hours ago

      I would prefer a model that does not demand infinite growth, leading to ever declining quality and services. I would prefer a tech site that’s satisfied bringing in a comfortable and steady flow of profit.

    • mesaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 hours ago

      Direct sponsoring has worked in the past with many open source projects (including lemmy.world). Could be closer to what Patreon does.

  • oh_
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2411 hours ago

    “Do evil.” Google’s official new slogan.

    • @lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 hours ago

      That’s true but I wouldn’t really classify this as evil.

      Serving videos isn’t easy or cheap. It’s hard and expensive.

      I obviously use an adblocker everywhere and so should you.

      But saying that Google or anyone else is doing anything wrong by blocking adblockers is ridiculous. When they finally succeed, I will just accept that I finally lost after many many years. My usage of YouTube will likely go down substantially as well. Crying about it after you have used their service for free for YEARS, really makes no sense.

      • @stellargmite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        You’re right, but also They get alot more from the deal than you acknowledge. The service has never been free. They already had a profitable model, and now they want even more. I call it evil, but in a sense it’s standard corporate behaviour.

    • @xzot746@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 hours ago

      Or “Might as well do EVIL”, what is anybody going to do about it, maybe make some noise but we just pay off TACO and we good.

  • @Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Oh hey I ran into that issue, fixed it by blocking the element on ublock and spoofing my user agent

    Edit: I put more details under nameisnotimportant’s comment, I was about to head to bed so I didn’t really provide details LOL

  • @Coolkat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1714 hours ago

    “Is your video not loading ? Check out why, you fucking ad dodging commie” is the feeling i got from youtube’s newest message while my video was unexpectedly taking 10s to load