Over the past few decades, the number of Americans who identify as religiously unaffiliated—often referred to as “nones”—has grown rapidly. In the 1970s, only about 5% of Americans fell into this category. Today, that number exceeds 25%. Scholars have debated whether this change simply reflects a general decline in belief, or whether it signals something more complex. The research team wanted to explore the deeper forces at play: Why are people leaving institutional religion? What are they replacing it with? And how are their personal values shaping that process?

  • @Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    510 hours ago

    I was a skeptical little kid, and I have been an atheist since I first learned of the term around 1st grade. I was also very interested in archeology and mythology, so exposure to all those other religions didn’t help the Christianity case. As a child, I assumed that the whole god/jesus thing was just like Santa and the Easter Bunny. That it was a made up story to instill morals in kids, and that eventually when I was older the adults would admit it to me. Of course, they never did. But I had a lot of friends at church and generally enjoyed my time there, so I didn’t openly talk about being an atheist until college.

    I actually do kind of miss the community aspect of a church. I have always assumed that is the biggest draw that keeps people interested. Both for the support network, and sense of belonging.

  • @Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1522 hours ago

    No no no, this ancient religion from the Middle East based off of several other cultures mythology is the TRUTH!

  • @samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 day ago

    My guess is that the extreme hatred flowing out of outspoken “Christians” in the US is a huge turn-off, as it should be.

  • @Zenith@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Everyone, myself included always come back to the same reason - there is no proof.

    If I was given actual proof of a god or pantheon or any other ridiculous nonsense I’d absolutely change my mind but actual proof magic exists can’t exist because magic isn’t real

    I fully accept that I don’t and can’t truly understand the universe but where the fuck does that somehow morph into “god did it” it’s ok not to know everything I don’t need made up bullshit to fill the gaps so I can feel better about not having every answer. Live with not knowing, that’s what being human is meant to be, acceptance

    • @gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 day ago

      god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”. by definition, such a thing exists, i would say.

      the issue is more with organized religion. there’s a lot of rules and bureaucracy in it, and most of that is outdated.

      • @zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 hours ago

        god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”.

        I hope you stretched before making that leap.

        Snark aside, this is just a dressed-up version of the “god of the gaps” argument, and is by no means proof of the existence of god. Changing the definition of “god” to be the “cause of all causes” is uselessly broad at best, and misattribution at worst - the “cause of all causes” may very well be a natural phenomenon, at which point attributing it to “god” is just straight up incorrect.

        by definition, such a thing exists, i would say.

        Actually, maybe not. There’s some new theories and evidence suggesting that it’s possible that the universe is eternal, as in it has always existed, making the existence of a “cause of all causes” impossible (unless of course you also water down the definition of that phrase to the point where it’s meaningless).

      • richieadler 🇦🇷
        link
        fedilink
        English
        322 hours ago

        god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”.

        Most believers will assert that their god exists in a different, more concrete way. The number of persons able or willing to discuss the topic on your terms is an insignificant minority.

      • @Ushmel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 hours ago

        Not if you actually tithe 10% like they want you to and have insurance and/or community support. Which of course not everyone has. But my point is that more insurance covers it now than 30 years ago.

  • @gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 day ago

    In the 1970s, only about 5% of Americans fell into this category. Today, that number exceeds 25%.

    That’s … a surprisingly slow transition. I can understand that an official turn away from christianity only started in the 1970s, fueled by a cultural revolution.

    But the fact that only 25% of people have officially said no to religion as of today is staggering me. I would have thought it would be closer to 80%, maybe.

    • @ReiRose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 hours ago

      Quantitative analysis showed a steep and consistent decline in institutional religious involvement. The number of respondents attending religious services dropped dramatically between 2003 and 2013. At the start of the study, over 80% attended services at least occasionally. By the end, nearly 60% reported never attending.

      Affiliation with religious institutions also declined, with formal identification falling from nearly 89% to just 60%. Belief in God showed a more modest drop—from about 83% to 66%—while individual spiritual practices like meditation actually increased. The percentage of participants who practiced meditation rose from 12% to over 21%, suggesting that spirituality remained meaningful even as institutional ties weakened.

      The ‘nones’ didn’t say no to religion, just to organized religion. Atheists are not in that percentage, nor are people who have a religious identity (eg Pagan, Jewish etc) but don’t actively go to gatherings of that religion.

    • @turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      524 hours ago

      Considering who has the fertility advantage here, I am not sure this trend will even continue indefinitely. I’ve seen it in my own distant family, the only ones to have a BUNCH were the weird-ass Christian extremists whose kids are all named Isaac and shit.

      The rest of us mostly had no kids, with a few having 1 or 2.

      And obviously, the intro to Idiocracy, but it’s true.

  • lemonaz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 day ago

    They have tech now. And conspiracy theories. Lots of stuff to cult about. They can build their own religion if they want.

    • @P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 day ago

      Not to mention you’ll do a better job at it if you think for yourself on the subject rather than delegating it to a spiritual leader with potentially dubious agendas

    • @Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      224 hours ago

      Most of us get our sense of decency from the inside. Some can only find it in a book. Which is more dangerous the person who sense of right and wrong are with them or the ones who are just one crisis of faith from not having any?