This article notes that “right-wing governments, including the US and Hungary, are increasingly blaming falling fertility rates on a rejection of parenthood”, as if today’s young adults just don’t want children.
But the author suggests that actually people do want children, and one of the main reasons they’re having fewer children is because they can’t afford many children.
Thoughts?
I’d love kids, but the world is fucked and it wouldn’t be fair on them.
TL;DR: money. It’s always just money. They want us to breed more slaves but they’re not willing to put up any collateral.
Also, civilsation is going to be brought to its knees by climate change in the coming decades.
Feels somewhat immoral to put someone you love through that.
Automation is going to chew up jobs faster than new ones are created, too.
Reduce the value of white collar labor, and white collar workers will flood to the blue collar trades, drastically reducing pay there as well.
Not a suitable environment for growing large families.
I think “money” falls short as an explanation (though it’s certainly part of it). Some countries like Sweden have substantially better state support for parents that the standard and the Swedish population isn’t exactly poor in general, either, yet they aren’t really getting that many more children than poorer countries with less support for parents.
Maybe so much money you can get other people to raise your kids for you, that kinda money 😎
Falling birthrates are not a problem for humanity.
They’re a problem for capitalism which can’t rely on that for nebulous “growth” figures.
But if capitalists really want a solution, then a home for two adults and two children should be affordable on one average wage, not two. Build more and make them cheaper. If you can’t do that then you don’t care about the problem enough.
A plateauing population is a good thing! Growth is not a good thing! I don’t get how people don’t understand this. If something is going up forever it will eventually collapse spectacularly, if it’s stable instead it’ll stay stable.
It might not be a problem in itself, but it’s certainly a symptom.
Raising children requires hope for he future.
Of course the first post ww2 generation to see lower prospects then their parents. Will hesitate to bring children into that future.
This is one of my main reasons for not wanting kids…why would I want to bring a child into a world where I couldn’t guarantee them a decent standard of upbringing and think that the world is only going to get worse over the next 20 years anyway?
The people who do all the handwringing about falling birth rates are the same people who bring them about by their shitty policies.
We are only one and done because of financial constraints. I’d say that the package of benefits the government offers parents in my location is fantastic and good on them for doing so well to pull it out of the bag. However, what they don’t help with is early years childcare costs (0-3 years) which costs us around the same as our mortgage each month. Only now are we able to get 30 hours paid care. That would be ok if the cost of living and mortgage rates weren’t already exorbitant and we cannot even consider taking another 3 year hit with our current young dependant.
So yeah, we’d love another kid, but we aren’t able to afford one!
This makes no sense
Millions of people are prevented from having the number of children they want by a toxic mix of economic barriers and sexism, a new UN report has warned.
How does that gel with the poorest countries in the world with societies that treat women like shit having the highest birth rate?
There’s a difference between Women harming their careers by having children, and not being able to a career other than SAHM because you aren’t able to get a career job in the first place. Both are sexist, and while it would work to increase the birth rate to remove women’s rights, it is morally reprehensible, and yes looks sternly at the US, we see what you are doing!
Most people, woman or not, don’t have “careers”
They have jobs vast majority of which are very low quality lol
Honestly can’t tell if you’re trolling with this.
Any job that would give you an advantage when applying for a new job (ie. Prior experience) is part of a career. For more formal careers like Medicine and Law they are an absolute necessity and often formally defined, for careers like Bartender, the requirements are more fluid, but experience (and particularly unbroken experience) is very important when applying for jobs.
Careful buddy, you might OD on daddy’s koolaid lol
Any job that would give you an advantage when applying for a new job
Nope. Only true if the new job offers benefit over the previous jobs.
Sorry to tell you this. But for many in modern society that is simply not the case. The growth in income or benefit at best covers the increase in cost of living.
With the huge increases in housing costs alone. Long term employment. Stable or steady replacement. Often fails to pay the increased dost of surviving as low income workers age.
For many low income families jobs last as long as the company success followed by random layoffs to support company shareholders. Followed by inflation only replacement work.
This is in no way a career just survival.
The acces to birth control?
Correct but even places with limited BC access. It seems everywhere birth rate is declining, including Muslim and African countries
I think uncertainty of employment is a huge issue. Enact a right to employment law.
One off transfers aren’t enough, there has to be consistent income stream. The hours of the work offered under this law must be flexible.
Of course, none of that is going to happen if the Government has a neoliberal mindset.
Better yet, offer no strings attached income. For everyone. We have a lot of jobs that don’t really need to exist and it’s entirely senseless to force people to do bullshit work. We gotta escape this nonsense cultural dead end that says work is some noble purpose.
Now that is an objectively true position that will never get traction in our hellworld.
