You must log in or register to comment.
Well, the human can consent, so that would make it perfectly ethical if they do.
this site uses cookies. To continue, you must agree to the terms and conditions. By hitting agree, you agree to the following.
- blah
- blah blah
- blah
- you consent to being turned in to a hat
- blah
agree?
Blindly hits “Agree”.
From the pov of a human or a cow?
Cow leather is more moral in my pov
Or is it about sourcing it from them after their natural death?
Even then cow leather seems more moralWhat do you base that on? A cow can’t consent to this.
Depends on the cow and the human.
If a cow is a dick and harming other cows, moral.
If the human lives a modest life and pursues charitable acts to make themself happy, immoral.
I feel like if a child with a similar level of cognition as the cow harms other children, most people will say they have no moral agency yet, and will still see harvesting their leather as immoral.
There are two ways to resolve that inconsistency…
Finally, humane child slaughter
