Despite this fall in coal reliance, the thinktank said, “most of the emissions cuts in 2023 are not sustainable from an industrial or climate policy perspective”.

Müller said: “The crisis-related slump in production weakens the German economy. If emissions are subsequently relocated abroad, then nothing has been achieved for the climate.”

  • Deceptichum
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    To hit its climate targets, Germany needed a “barrage of investments” to modernise industry and reduce the carbon footprint from heating, Müller said.

    Hmmm decades of profits and they couldn’t afford to do it themselves without needing a barrage of investments?

    New solution, ban all dividends and payouts from companies until they invest in being clean.

    • @MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      You can not outsource certain emissions like the electricity grid, transport within the country and heating. Also Germany is a massive exporter of industrial products.

  • @bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    So, still twice the co2 emission of France nuclear based energy production. Good job ecology nerds.

    • @MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      or 60% more per capita and propably around 18% more then the EU per capita.

      What do you expect from a country most famous for genocide and killing millions in two World Wars?

  • @bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    If you’re adding the context that basically says “it’s all bogus”, why not adjust the headline accordingly? This makes it seem like Germany actually did something to protect the climate.

    • @sic_1@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Yeah, we wrecked the economy by trapping it in dead end technologies and killing off innovations for decades under conservative government. Degrowth like a champ!