• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    IIRC the reason the queen is such a powerful piece is because the original piece was called something like “The Commander” or “The Champion”, and the idea of that being a separate person from the King didn’t make sense once the game reached Europe amid the chivalric code and specific rules about how lords and monarchs are to be handled on the battlefield.

    • @MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      You’re probably after the vizier. Apocryphally, the queen’s moves as currently seen originated when Queen Isobella I of Spain was pissed that the queen was a weak piece, it did indeed arise in Spain during her reign, whether for that reason is left to the reader’s imagination.

  • @bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The king is not weak. In 100% of games it’s the last piece to fall.

    Statistically the pawn to the rightmost of the white king also survives in some 70%, while the queen only has about 49% chance of survival to the end.

    The knights and the pawn in front of the queen are the first to go.

    • NaibofTabr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      The king is not weak. In 100% of games it’s the last piece to fall.

      Yes, well that’s because he puts everyone else in harm’s way first. Typical behavior for a “noble”.

  • Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Doesn’t the Queen sit on her own colour?

  • @Why9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    The real story is how a king as old and frail as him managed to get a queen as young, fit and loyal as her, willing to slay anything that appears within her sight…