• Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    First person: Talking about oneself. I, me. Second person: talking about the listener. you, your. Third person: talking about someone who is not the speaker or listener. He/she/it/they Fourth person: Talking about total bullshit.

    In this context, “Chat” is second-person plural, used by streamers to address the portion of their audience able to respond in the text chat that always accompanies these things. It does contrast with how a radio personality might address “listeners” because radio listeners don’t usually have a method to respond in real time, so it’s usually a rhetorical question; a streamer addressing the chat is asking for a response.

    • @shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      i saw someone argue for chat being a 4th person pronoun because it breaks the 4th wall usually seen in mass broadcast media, there’s still a degree of interaction that isn’t there on live TV, so “chat is this real” prompts a direct response from a unified mass of people, there’s a conversation happening through the 4th wall basically

      the other person explained it better lol

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Eh, I don’t think that holds up.

        I might buy the 4th person as “someone outside your continuum or reality,” but I’ve yet to see a language construct specifically for that. Fictional characters invariably use second or third person to refer to the audience outside their world.

        Streamers talking with their chat audience aren’t fictional or otherworldly though. I don’t see a linguistic difference between a streamer asking the chat what game he should play next, to Bob Saget saying “Home viewers, if you have a funny home video, send the tape to the address on your screen for a chance at appearing on our show!” It’s a communique addressing a large scattered audience through audio/video telephony soliciting a reply. The only real difference is round-trip latency.

        While I think the phenomenon of live streaming and their audiences is interesting and presents a fairly new experience, I don’t know if it’s “we’re inventing new pronoun tenses over here.”

  • Troy
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Is it really that different than saying “Audience”? Or radio shows referring to “listeners”? Etc.

    • The Picard ManeuverOP
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Seems like the same thing to me. I think the person saying it’s the first of its kind is wrong, but it would still be equally bizarre if people were addressing their “listeners” in normal conversation.

      • @blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Yeah, it would be weird to say ‘listeners’ when talking to a group. But social conventions and language shifts. “chat” has established itself for pretty obvious reasons, so I’m not surprised to see it catch on in the physical world. It’s a bit like people saying ‘lol’ in person was super weird at first, but isn’t that weird any more.

        Also, I don’t think it is anywhere near as weird as how politicians address what they are saying to “Mr. Speaker” when they are clearly actually not talking to that person at all.

    • Chetzemoka
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Or “y’all”

      Saying “chat” to address a group or room full of people isn’t different at all from addressing them as “y’all”

    • @milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Ladies and Gentlemen

      Friends

      Guys

      [To the] Saints in Ephesus

      Gentlemen of the jury

      Kids!

      Class

      Respected Members of the Lemeritus Comment Section Elle

      [the] House

  • CarlsIII
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    It’s not even a pronoun in this context, it’s just a noun.

    • @prayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      It speaks to a person that isn’t physically present and just an observer. “You” typically addresses someone directly, but can be used to break the 4th wall and talk to observers. “Chat” is exclusively for breaking the 4th wall.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Nah, “chat” is talking to a specific, present group of people, and is used in lieu of writing a text chat. It’s not like a film actor speaking to the audience, who has no way of responding. Even so, any terms used in breaking the fourth wall would still be second person, ability to respond and presence aren’t a requirement here (e.g. you’d use “you” in letters, and the reader is absolutely not present).

  • PatFusty
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I usually say “smash that like button” but ill throw in “chat” in the future to stay relevant with these kids.

    Smash that like button if you agree with me chat

  • Alien Nathan Edward
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    it’s definitely 2nd person collective in its original usage and outside of its original usage it’s not a pronoun because it doesn’t replace a noun.

    • @milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I don’t think it’s a pronoun at all. It’s a collective noun, and a term of address.

      “Ladies and Gentlemen” is also not a pronoun.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Maybe she should be more concerned that students are asking if her class is real.

    • Gnome Kat
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I am not sure if you are being genuine or not (chat?) but in case you are the phrase is not asking if something is literally real. It’s a way to express surprise at a situation “wow this thing is really happening”.

  • @chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    My rl name starts with Chat and I introduce myself as such most places. It’s pronounced differently though, since it’s based on a French word. The Ch has an Sh sound. And yes, I know what that sounds like…

  • @lugal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    There are languages with a 4th person pronoun. The 3rd person is kind of the main character and the 4th someone else. That helps to disambiguate sentences like “The criminal shot the cop and drove away on his (own or the cop’s) bike”.

    Or the “gay fanfiction problem”: “He looked at him and lay his hands on his lap”. Is it a happy ending or a sad one? That’s one theory why gender in pronouns is so resilient: more often than not, the gendered pronoun can disambiguate which person is talked about. It doesn’t always work, a 3rd/4rd person distinction is superior.

  • Amanduh
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Probably has something to do with meat crayons video, I’ve been hanging out with some 20 year olds in discord and theh routinely make jokes based off this video.

    https://youtu.be/Quhb0RMtfH4

  • SuperDuper
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    First person = someone describing their own point of view (ex: I, me)

    Second person = someone being addressed (ex: you, y’all)

    Third person = someone talking about someone else (ex: they, them)

    Fourth person = the point of view of a collective group (ex: we, us)

    • @Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I can’t tell if you’re making a joke or not, but when I learned it “we” was first person plural. Likewise “y’all” was second person plural, etc.