• The Barto
      link
      fedilink
      632 years ago

      That’s also the list of countries that have better internet than Australia.

      • @Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        25
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Last I remember, the Baltic states have better internet than most of Europe and the US.

        • @Nihilistra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          132 years ago

          Yo, german bro here. When I go by train from my village Willich to fucking Düsseldorf I lose connection 2 times, going 10 kilometers into the state capital.

          My friend in Wesel can’t reliably call his clients by car cause it’s just a connectivity minefield around there.

          Send help

          • Karyoplasma
            link
            fedilink
            112 years ago

            Germany is so far behind with wifi coverage, it’s insane. Fiber is also rare outside of the hotspots. I volunteered in a refugee center once and an ongoing joke among them was how war-torn Syria had better internet connection than Germany lol

            • AlexisFR
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              I really don’t get it, if we in France did it, why not Germany?

              • Karyoplasma
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Old farts in charge don’t care about it. Merkel has promised full net coverage a couple times but oh well. It’s definitely better than it was before, but there are still lots of areas where there is work to be done. As our saying goes: Deutschlands Mühlen mahlen langsam. (Germany’s mills grind slowly)

    • SuperJetShoes
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Cyprus too. The EU’s farthest eastern outpost. 100km from Beirut, Lebanon.

  • @rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    87
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Almost like news written in english tends to focus on english-speaking countries and their allies

    • mycorrhiza they/them
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      The obvious context of this meme is articles that express the “consensus opinion of the international community” on some foreign issue. Like “international community condemns antisemetic criticism of Israel.” Or “international community condemns Niger coup, calls for original government to be reinstated so France can keep buying cheap Uranium from the second poorest country on the planet.”

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      Was about to say. Oh my God the interconnected western world cares about the western world!

      More news at 11.

    • Yeah fuck my local news station for covering local news. It should only be coverage about places that I will never go to, issues I have no control over, and be an exercise in guilt and self-righteous masturbation for the people running it.

  • MxM111
    link
    fedilink
    702 years ago

    Basically democracies. It is kind of difficult to consider non-democratic dictators like Putin or Kim Jong-un as representatives of some kind of “community”.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        312 years ago

        Also a not-insignificant amount of Asia, Africa, and Pacific islands.

      • @Furball@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        South America just isn’t really too involved in international politics in general, the whole region is neutral in almost all conflicts since very few directly affect them

              • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                If you use the old Cold War definition, yes. Otherwise

                However, as the Cold War ended with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the definition largely shifted to instead refer to any country that boasts a well-functioning democratic system with little prospects of political risk, in addition to a strong rule of law, a capitalist economy with economic stability, and a high standard of living.

      • MxM111
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Of course. I am not going to defend the particular choice of countries in that picture. Where is South Korea, for example? However. Democracy is greater than just democratic election. Fascists in Germany also come to power in a free democratic election, does not make Nazi Germany a democratic country.

        • @KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          The nazis in Germany came to power in the “Machtergreifung” (seizure of power).
          In the last free democratic election, they got 33% of the vote.

    • KidNamedLainah
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      Never realized South Korea, Taiwan, or other SEA countries are not democracies but dictatorships.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 years ago

        South Korea at least should probably be included in this map. It generally does include capitalist democracies, but it’s not sufficient and probably not necessary for the general criteria.

      • @GenEcon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Never heard that they don’t generally stand alongside the rest of democracies if you hear ‘international community’. All of them condemning Russias attack on Ukraine, China taking parts of the Philippines and the terrorist attack on Israel from the Hamas.

    • BabyWah
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      They’re only dictators in our minds, because the West has told us they are for years. I’ve always wondered what’s really behind their strategy, but we can’t get unbiased news about their countries and the people living there anymore.

      It’s really interesting to me because they are dictators, they’re also the only countries that managed to give the big finger to the US’ meddling and disrupting regional politics. Did they become dictators to stop that or is it a chicken and the egg situation? Need more info.

        • @Land_Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          Current Africa is the fault of British and French. Current Middle East the fault of British, French and the USA. Current India has strong feelings against the British. Current Iran has a strong theocracy because of the USA. Current South America still feels the effects of the USA’s CIA’s meddling.

          Of course it is your oil-and-war-industry-mirror governments. It has been an entity whose sole focus has been war profiteering and thus warmongering at least since the WW2, no matter how democratically(!) you choose your presidents. Your warmongering government doesn’t even care about its citizens (see healthcare, gun laws, abortion laws, lgbt laws, online and other privacy rights, etc.). Your whole nationwide and even international media is a public opinion shaping and damage control asset for the government.

          What the fuck do you expect to hear from other people, who have been direct or indirect victims of your warmongering and coups, to say about this? Tell you that is is so known a fact that we can practically ignore it at this point and carry on with our lives? Problem is, unless you stop, we can’t even carry on with our lives.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        Are they only dictators in our minds or are they dictators? You don’t seem to be sure.

        • BabyWah
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Yes I’m not sure, only in the sense that I’ve seen what happens when you kill a dictator and try to replace it with ‘democracy.’

          Everyone swoops in, hires some armed forces to get the natural resources they need and then leaves. The population is left to fend themselves and are usually governed for decades by the stronger mostly extremist government party. By the time they revolt, they get beat down again and again, until they just give up and the country descends into another humanitarian crisis.

          It just sets them back for decades. That’s all.

    • @avrachan@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      yeah,

      these are the democracies that invaded Iraq/Libya to install a democracy.

      I keep having to remind myself how much good it did to the people of Iraq/Libya.

      • MxM111
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Nothing odd about it. There are historical reasons for that. But English speaking? You do know that there are many countries in EU?

          • MxM111
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Even as primarily, this is false statement. And even there, there are historical reasons.

            • @irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              You are so stuck on details you entirely missed my point. Are you just going to ignore the fact that the “world” depicted here is literally just Europe and its most successful colonies?

              Yeah colonialism is a “historical reason”, but wtf are you even saying there? Being killed is “a reason” to be lying on the stairs, but explaining that by saying “he has his reasons” is so out-of-touch as to be insane.

  • NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 years ago

    Idk, I feel like Al Jazeera gets quite a bit of visibility and has a good amount of credibility, but Qatar isn’t on this map.

    • lom
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Credibility? It’s Qatari state media

      • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        It is, so you definitely want to keep that in mind when consuming their content. On the flipside, they have access to sources in the Middle East that your big mainstream western media organizations can only dream about, so you don’t want to ignore them entirely either. There are ways to be smart about it.

  • DreamButt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    South Korea is pretty good about pumping out culturally relevant stuff too. Honestly I’d say they do it better than Japan these days (not that I’m personally interested in stuff like k-pop, but it’s clearly huge)

    • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Korea is certainly ascendant but I doubt they’ve passed Japan in cultural exports. At least in the US, there is anime and Sushi in basically every population center these days, whereas Korean BBQ and chicken are still mostly popular in large urban areas (where sushi is still way more popular).

    • @Ad4mWayn3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Genuine question: How exactly are they more culturally relevant than Japan besides K-pop and maybe Korean novels? When it comes to matters besides entertainment, I guess I’m a little clueless.

      • @Knightfox@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Not the OP, but I think that’s exactly what they’re talking about, entertainment. I don’t know if Korea has overtaken Japan in that sphere, but it’s certainly significant. I’d also point out that Korea’s COVID response was so organized that there was a period of time that it was being looked to and mentioned in the media which is culturally relevant (kinda like pointing out the Finnish education system or the German reputation for engineering).

  • @NoiseColor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    I don’t know about US but EU has a bunch of news agencies that are fairly credible. Some local smaller ones don’t have a reason not to be.

    The international community in the picture is all that matters. Change the size of the countries in the map by the size of their economies and that’s all that matters. Change it by the factor of their diplomatic influence and the change would be even greater.

      • @NoiseColor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If you ever talk about an international community, these are the only countries that actually COMMUNE. Almost all the rest are too involved with themselves to have a diplomatic strategy beyond their narrow short-term self interest. That’s also why that’s the only international community that matters. That’s not a tone deaf world view, that’s the reality.

        • BabyWah
          link
          fedilink
          112 years ago

          No, these are the only countries that destabilised entire continents to get what they wanted in the last few centuries and now they wash their hands off of them. The countries that are left behind are still trying to clean the shit up the West has created.

        • @SolarNialamide@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          You mean the only ones you hear about communing as a westerner. Pretty much every geographical region has political and economic collaborative institutions for long term stability and growth, and then there’s also things like BRICS that’s not just bound by geography. The BRI is a plan so incredibly long term election-based democracies could never even dream of it, that spans East, Central and West Asia, and is economic, political, social, infrastructural etc etc. Just because you never bothered to broaden your horizon doesn’t mean the entire fucking rest of the world doesn’t collaborate with each other just like Europe and western countries in general do.

          • @NoiseColor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            No, I don’t mean what you wrote. Yes, I know there are many organizations in the world.

            BRICS? LOLOLOLOL. Do you know anything about BRICS? If you want to broaden YOUR horizon, check which countries are in BRICS and the level of cooperation they have between them. BRICS is a joke. 5 countries, each pulling in its own direction, each too busy trying to deal with it’s own national mess. They meet PR once a year so they look important. Two of them are absolutist dictatorships to the point that one leader can’t even travel to visit the other ones. Two of them are even attacking each other.

            Are you effing kidding me!?? Broaden my horizon? Bro!?

          • @SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            That part about brics was the funniest shit. Let me know when they get past their infighting to actually do something other than dream big

          • @WldFyre@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            a plan so incredibly long term election-based democracies could never even dream of it

            What types of democracies aren’t election based?

              • @NoiseColor@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                Sure they do, but I’m not into nitpicking specific situations or argue about edge cases.

                They don’t really like each other, mostly they see themselves as competitors and their treaties are situational, worth nothing except in the best of times when everything is going well for everyone.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  52 years ago

                  Edge cases? Are you serious? Since when does the U.S. give a shit about anyone but the U.S.?

                  And saying that the U.S. respects its treaties shows a laughable ignorance of history.

    • BabyWah
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      The EU news is real bare bones, that’s why you get the feeling they’re credible. They only parrot what someone else wrote already. Please put your Google Translate on and look at news sites from countries outside your country or region. And then make up your own mind. It’s the only way to evolve yourself.

      • @NoiseColor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        You are very wrong. Each country in EU has its own news agencies and many of them have reporters all over the world, even in conflict zones. It is simply not possible to push narratives through such an amount of channels, like they do in the US. Of course some news gets parotted, that’s how news works, but a Slovenian reporter, reporting from Ukraine doesn’t care what NYT said about anything.

        • BabyWah
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          I don’t know, I read European news sites first and there really is less debt to them than other sources. Or it’s just a few paragraphs without the background or history etc… I have to admit, the last few years some have mitigated this by doing more research, filing it under ‘dossiers’ and I really like their fact checking. But maybe you’re right and they can’t put everything out there.

      • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        You don’t know WTF you’re talking about and it shows. You obviously have no formal training in journalism or mass communications, but here you are spouting off like the self-appointed armchair “expert” you are. Just consuming news doesn’t make you an expert; it makes you a consumer with a poorly-informed opinion. Again, you obviously have no idea how any of this works.

  • BabyWah
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    ‘Western’ media is known in the outside world to report the horrific truth AFTER a war has ended. Or they just wait until enough people make a stink about it, look at Ukraine in their second war.

    Just look at what happened in the Bosnian war, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Qatar, Africa, Asia… And the atrocities committed there were systematically underreported. Sure, they’ll write a few uninspired paragraphs about it and move on.

    I’m not saying Eastern media isn’t biased, they report more emotional so you have to filter that out. And it’s an active war, so they might get some misinformation. But over the years they proved to be more often than not right after everything’s done. (Looking at you Srebrenica and all the US wars).

    Then the Western media swoops in and makes some documentaries about facts most people with a satellite dish or a second language already knew. Thoughts and Prayers.

    After the Ukrainian war started this changed. It’s the first time everybody and their mother can follow the war while it’s happening.

    Now it’s happening again in Gaza, but journalists are getting killed en masse because the other side knows about it.

    I really recommend everyone to read and watch different sources from different countries/languages and make up their own mind. There’s Google translate if you can’t speak several languages.

    • @SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      I don’t know what news you read but what you’re saying is wrong - there definitely has been extensive news coverage on all the wars and conflicts you mentioned, it’s just a matter of reading them.

      For christ sake Bosnian war was ended by the west when the public pressure to stop a literal genocide grew too large, the massacre of Srebrenica being a massive catalyst to it. How “eastern media” was suddenly more right about it than western sources who actually were there is a point I either misunderstand or, more likely, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

      Also calling eastern media “more emotional” has that little subtle bit of racism, really putting the irony as the icing on this horrible comment.

      There are many reasons to read all media with the assumption that it is biased but this isn’t it.

      • @crackajack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Also calling eastern media “more emotional” has that little subtle bit of racism, really putting the irony as the icing on this horrible comment.

        Yup. Calling Eastern media emotional when Western media is just as bad with sensationalism, especially American news.

        • @SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Yeah idk. It’s just that calling someone “emotional” is very belittling. oh those palestinians seem very emotional about the whole hospital oopsie-woopsie

    • @dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      the first time everybody and their mother can follow the war while it’s happening

      You’re thinking of the Gulf War. The invasion of Iraq was literally televised (almost) live everywhere on the world. Vietnam also had an extremely high reporting rate which contributed to the anti-war protests and movement in the US and the eventual withdrawal.

      Also, targeting journalist to kill them is an old-time tradition amongst war criminals ever since the journalist profession was defined in the like XVII century.