• Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    752 years ago

    Good. Do it. They deserve healthcare and reasonable wages.

  • PhobosAnomaly
    link
    fedilink
    602 years ago

    Absolutely love Formula 1, been a fan for 30 years, find the whole cutting edge technology and it’s public applications fascinating…

    …but yeah lol fuck the circus. Formula 1 has gone from pure greed on the organisation front to unadulterated morally bankrupt and taking-the-piss greed. Saudi, Qatar, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi… yeah nah fuck that noise, a bit of fire under Liberty Media’s chair would do them good.

    It runs the risk of fucking the Vegas fanbase off 2005-stylez, but hey it can’t have been too terrible if there’s now three US races on the calendar.

      • @NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        “Zero safe limits” has a lot to do with the scale. While it can’t be good for those in attendance, between the relative infrequency of races, limited number of cars on the field, and general use of batteries even in the ICE leagues (let alone caring about emissions for efficiency purposes), it is probably perfectly fine. Or, more pointedly, all the OTHER emissions are likely a much bigger concern.

        Also, the number of safety and societal dangers of F1 go WELL beyond just dangerous fuel. Like, I enjoy watching the occasional race. But holy shit does F1 make pro wrestling look “not THAT bad…”

          • JJROKCZ
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Not all series use the same fuel as formula 1, pretty much just formula 1&2

        • @aelwero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Their point has validity on any scale though… I’m generally not a fan of “zero tolerance” in any context, but the context here is ostensibly an intentionally equalized playing field, meaning that a zero tolerance policy on any aspect is inherently fair… So there’s really no excuse for accepting environmental hazards…

          The assertion that allowance of additives (any additives that pose environmental/spectator hazards) has no benefit other than “car go fast”, is a solid point.

          • @NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The waste from the cars, the maintenance, transportation, and the event itself go above and beyond. Yes, everyone totally keeps the fancy kitty litter around to get every single leak and so forth. Sure…

            Not to mention the increased exhaust.

            As for scale: Yes, it really does matter.

            Rough numbers time.

            • According to chatgpt, an F1 car has a max fuel capacity of 110 kg per race. Obviously they try to avoid using all of that for a range of reasons, but sure. Not gonna bother to write the math, but that is about 39.29 gallons.
            • Roughly 20 cars on the starting grid, and let’s assume for the sake of easy math that every car used a full tank for practice, both rounds of qualifiers, and the race itself. So 4*39.29*20=3143 gallons per race for the cars alone.
            • Still chatgpt because the window is open, but the average sedan has 12-18 gallons tanks.
            • 3143 / 12 = 261 cars. 261 cars use the amount of fuel used in a single F1 race in between trips to the gas station.
            • Still using chatgpt: average attendance numbers range from 10k to 100k spectators.

            So yeah. The amount of fuel used in a given F1 race is a drop in the bucket relative to just how much is used by the cars that bring people to watch them. And I have intentionally not included the trucks used to transport the f1 cars or even the trains and boats.

            And that is why, while it isn’t good and I am opposed to it, the lead that may or may not still be used in F1 fuel (chat gpt says no, random ass quora page says 5 mg/L. Whereas, if there were even trace amounts of lead in the gas that gets everyone else to the F1 race…

            The environmental impact of an F1 race, let alone a season, is horrendous. Even if we are talking formula E or whatever the current pure electric league is. And fixating on older fuel composition in the light of that is, quite frankly, asinine and self defeating.

            Hell, the dirt and dust around the more rural tracks probably has MUCH more lead than the fuel.

          • @ImpossibilityBox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Here’s something that you might find annoying:

            According to the EPA 61 FR 3832 - Prohibition on Gasoline Containing Lead or Lead Additives for Highway Use

            EPA has historically defined unleaded gasoline as gasoline that is produced without the use of any lead additive and that contains no more than 0.05 gram of lead per gallon. EPA interprets section 211(n) this way for the following reasons. The regulatory definition of ``unleaded gasoline’’ also contains a cap on the amount of phosphorus, see 40 CFR 80.2(g), but the phosphorus cap is not relevant to the discussion of section 211(n). Unleaded gasoline that was produced without lead additives may pick up trace amounts of lead as it passes through refinery and transport systems that had previously contained leaded gasoline.

            This is the same limit Formula 1 has for its fuels. Formula 1 fuel is unleaded fuel.

      • @evulhotdog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        For Formula 1 cars it is 5mg/l. Old four star leaded has about 840mg/l but is now banned. In the UK low lead petrol is available from a small number of specialist garages for classic cars which cannot run on unleaded and contains about 75mg/l.

        So while none is the best, this is a very small fraction in comparison as to what it used to be, and it also is to cover cross contamination purposes.

    • AlexisFR
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      I agree, this GP need to be a catastrophe, it’s time Stefano get a reality check.

  • @weksa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    242 years ago

    I was in Vegas last month. Uber/Lyft drivers are fed up too. One driver told me that he used to meet his goals by 11am. Because of F1 construction traffic, now he’s driving an extra 10-15 hours per day to meet those same goals. He’s gonna be out of town this F1 month, visiting a friend in another state to consider moving there.

    Life is becoming worse for the residents, while the casinos get richer.

    • @CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      It’s 35,000 more than last year. Along with the actors strike, and right after the UAW strikes. Lets leave the defeatism on reddit.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    AWS reInvent starts in three weeks. Amazon doesn’t want any of their employees to be exposed to unions.

  • @Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I totally agree, I was just making a joke because our or french friends are quite something when it comes to strikes and protest.