Already looking ahead to the turmoil his re-election could cause, Donald Trump and his allies are reportedly circling an idea to invoke the Insurrection Act on his first day in office, deploying the military to act as domestic law enforcement.

According to a Washington Post report on Sunday, the drafting of such plans has largely been “unofficially outsourced” thus far to a coalition of right-wing think tanks working under the title “Project 2025.” It was identified as an immediate priority for the hypothetical resurrected Trump administration, internal communications obtained by the newspaper showed.

In response to questions from the Post, Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung provided a statement: “President Trump is focused on crushing his opponents in the primary election and then going on to beat Crooked Joe Biden,” he said. “President Trump has always stood for law and order, and protecting the Constitution.”

  • Teon
    link
    fedilink
    832 years ago

    One failed coup, on trial for insurrection and planning the next one.
    Welcome to this episode of “Dumb Criminals”.

    • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      Trump lost the popular vote last time but still got enough state victories to win with Electoral College votes, and he is less popular now than then, but his base is very vocal and with so many adults disassociating themselves with the Republican Party it makes it a very bottom of the barrel pool for candidates.

      The problem is there is only one other national party with any chance of winning, and their candidate just gave more weapons to the nation currently bombing children’s hospitals and refugee camps.

      So while the average US Citizen might be better than this, our ancestors built a system and our elders corrupted it to the point where a large enough coalition of below average people can destroy the nation. Yes, we’re really that stupid.

      • @Cerbero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Yet those people were smarter than his supporters. they saw someone smart and decided to put him in power.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Not a good example because Camacho literally acknowledged that there was a problem and then put the smartest man in the world towards fixing it.

          • Queen HawlSera
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Reality is Stranger Than fiction, not because we live in a world of Wonder and miracle or there’s some kind of magic in the world that makes things happen. But simply because people who write fiction typically want it to make sense.

    • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Evidently yes. I can’t even wrap my head around it. I will die before ever fully understanding how any grown and evidently sane adult could ever look at Donald Trump and say to themselves, “yeah, that’s the guy I want for my president!” I just can’t fathom it. I’ve had years to think about it but it still simply does not compute.

  • AphoticDev
    link
    fedilink
    472 years ago

    Man, I was hoping that since we’re obviously gonna end up with a dystopia, that it would be a cyberpunk one, but here we are, gonna be stuck with a regular boring ass dictatorship.

  • @walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    302 years ago

    I like to think I can read pretty good, but I couldn’t figure out how the post summary is related to the article.

    • mosiacmango
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Dailybeast does a “doomscroll” load next article thing. That paragraph is from that. Its on the same page, so the bot likely just fucked up. Here’s the article name if y’all want context:

      Inside the Mean-Girl Army Going to War for a Celebrity Dietician

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    282 years ago

    How to have large swathes of the military join the protestors, step 1.

    People IMO VASTLY overestimate the popularity of the Republicans among the troops. It probably breaks about the same way as the general populace, and as far as being willing to follow orders to march against protestors, the troops that would do it are probably more worried about their own fellow soldiers turning on them than they are about being reprimanded for saying no.

    • @homura1650@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      That might be the point. Deploy the military in a low stakes situation to see who listens. Kick all the defactors out of the military. Then, when you actually need them, you are left with a military full of loyalists.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        I think attempting that would instantly prompt an international crisis for no reason other than the fact that the US would instantly be reduced to a sliver of its usual operating military strength.

        Forget the military turning on itself, at that point the EU are sending troops over for an intervention.

        • @bad_alloc@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Forget the military turning on itself, at that point the EU are sending troops over for an intervention.

          Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your judicial and regulatory distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt no not misuse regional names for foods. Resistance is negotiable in parliament, but will take a long time to do so.

        • @RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          The USA is it’s own continent, noone is going to attempt to send troops over. A self coup like that is very plausible, it’s been done many times before in other countries and there’s nothing exceptional about the USA in this regard.

      • Lightor
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        It’s not that easy. You could lose the wrong kind of people, let leaders, have rank imbalance. It’s not one big pool of people. I mean what if 70% refuse? We just neuter ourselves?

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Hmm, maybe that could introduce some variability but I’d point to the DC riots where NG troops were so ashamed of what they were doing that several confessed to reporters that they were lying to their families and saying they weren’t deployed for that.

        Ultimately it’ll end up coming down to how willing your typical boots on the ground in the moment soldier would react to being given such a wildly unconstitutional order as to openly engage in hostilities against dissenters, to that end I believe the US shares Germany’s protection of the right to refuse an unlawful order and to arrest the superior issuing and trying to force it.

        I also think most military higher ups tend to air at least on the side of not being flagrant about contempting the general lean of the public against a more right wing posture, so I’d place decent odds that Trump would be playing with the possibility of the US military going on strike rather than assisting his attempt at being a big strong boss man and locking up everyone who disagrees.

        We could debate what a general strike would do to the US economy, but we can all agree that the USM going on strike would more or less instantly prompt constitutional crisis mode.

  • andrew_bidlaw
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    And the guy called Cheung is behind that quote? Wake up sweety, you’d go into conc camps, just like asian-looking americans did while the ww2 was going on.

  • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    They would have to do something about Posse Comitatus first.

    https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/posse-comitatus-revisited-use-military-civil-law-enforcement

    “The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which removed the military from regular civil law enforcement, was enacted in response to the abuses resulting from the extensive use of the army in civil law enforcement during the Civil War and the Reconstruction. The Act allows legislated exceptions.”

    • wagesj45
      link
      fedilink
      222 years ago

      That “something” might just turn out to be as simple as “ignore it”.

      • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        I mean, I guess, they could try… but then they would be delivering unlawful orders to the military. That likely won’t go the way they think it will go.

        • @doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          The military has been deployed against the civilian populace before, re the Ohio State massacre. This would be on a whole other level, but there is precedent.

    • @Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Because, as we’ve seen, Trump would totes follow the Rule of Law…then again, who needs silly things like Laws when you become the self-declared Lord Emperor after “fixing” America.

    • @CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      “abuses… during the Civil War and the Reconstruction”, as if there wasn’t a bunch of states that not only rebelled, but refused to enforce Federal law after the civil war.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      Why do you think Tuberville is deliberately crippling the officer corps?

  • @Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 years ago

    They’re going to meet some metaphorical roadblocks along the military chain of command, and they’ll meet physical roadblocks of well equipped citizens who won’t stand for this.

    • @funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The first part maybe, but the second - no.

      There might be pockets of small arms fire and a few civ x mil casualties, but anything beyond that is pure fantasy. It would quickly become a question of “are you willing to go on a kamikaze guaranteed suicide mission to be heard and die at the hands of the US military, now, today, in protest?”

      “They can’t stop us all!”

      True, but you don’t have “us” all. You think my 99 year old grandmother is going to fight the US military? What about my friends 5 year old? What about my father in law who cares for another elderly relative and is their only hope of survival? What about my wife who needs regular medication?

      There are so many of us who, despite our extreme ideological opposition to fascism simply wouldn’t be effective infantry. Hell even most people who regularly hunt deer and shoot guns daily at the range will fall to military tactics, because hunting a garrison of soldiers in vehicles, with air support and explosives, who shoot back, and have been trained in how to reinforce their positions etc is very different to shooting a static paper target that’s not behind cover in a straight line ahead of you at eye level.

      I reckon, if I got the jump on an unsuspecting soldier who wasn’t expecting it, and I was armed, I’d have a 55% chance of murdering him. Add just one other person watching his back and I’d be dead before I could do more than bruise him.

      The 2A Fantasy of fighting back against a tyrannical government requires a well-organized militia. Which means putting Sunday school teachers, middle managers, dentists and retail workers through months of boot camp training. During those months, who’s fighting?

      Just look at Israel / Palestine. We’d be Palestine. Yes, a few guerilla tactics would kill dozens of soldiers, who’d then retaliate and kill thousands of civilians, while the rest of the world goes, “Oh no.”

      • @NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’ll add on that the first part is also a fantasy.

        I’ve known and worked with a lot of “military leadership” over the decades. If they were as heroic and as dedicated to protecting The Constitution as people pretend they are: They would not have waited on January 6th. They would have decided “the exiting president is engaging in a coup and the vice president is MIA. And the Speaker is under siege. Autobots, roll out”

        Instead, they sat on their hands and waited to see how things shake out.

        Which is what would happen. Martial law? Cool, “this is what we trained for”. Putting down uprisings? MAYBE there would be some light hesitation until one gravy seal got overly excited and shot their load off. At which point, the training kicks in and they expect everyone to say “thank you for your service” for the rest of their lives because they put down the insurgents.

        Because soldiers are not inherently evil. But they sure do commit a LOT of war crimes and crimes against humanity. And that is because they are indoctrinated to follow orders and care more about “the man in the foxhole next to you” than anyone else.

        And the people who make it a career of indoctrinating those dumbass kids and sending them to fuck up the world? They aren’t going to be rocking the boat.

    • RubberStuntBaby
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      I worry that most of the “well armed citizens” will be thrilled to support him in this.

      • @rustyfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        This. And also most civilians have a working self-preservation instinct. They will duck and run the moment shots are being fired. Hell, there are even cops who are like this. Everyone who thinks of himself a Rambo will have those sudden tummy aches the moment shit goes down.

  • fiat_lux
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    Good thing they sent a strong message to rioters that the consequences for storming the Capitol to overturn an election is… maybe a couple of years in prison maximum. I’m sure that’s enough to dissuade Trump from trying again. He wouldn’t want to hurt his supporters, would he? /s (every sentence)

  • Karyoplasma
    link
    fedilink
    122 years ago

    Trump was the exemplary student of “Escalation 101” at Dicks University.

    • ZILtoid1991
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      When they win, they will try to rehabilitate the “conservative salute”.

    • @Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      And yet not a single person with the power to do anything right now - is doing anything right now.

      Motherfucker is still outright disrespecting our entire system of justice - or whatever is left of it for the rich.

      • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        This is not true at all. There are many very powerful people working very hard to make sure that he’s not reelected. That you don’t know about it says more about you than it does anyone else. You just aren’t paying attention.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Well if they actually punished people when they did something wrong, then it wouldn’t look very good for decorum now would it?