• Skua
        link
        fedilink
        352 years ago

        Only Gaza. About half of the population of Palestine is the in the West Bank, and Hamas doesn’t run that

        • @YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Time will tell I guess. I don’t have a horse in this race so it’s just me and my opinions here.

  • @drekly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    The UN had supplies for a humanitarian crisis. 1+ million people are being evacuated, and more bombs have now been dropped than an entire year in Afghanistan. Is this not a humanitarian crisis?

    If Hamas is the government, and the aid is there, then the government has received the aid that the UN delivered?

    I’m sure there’s more to this, that’s not mentioned, but the context is odd.

      • @Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 years ago

        And you’re not an Israeli apologist? They haven’t agreed with either side, they simply said both are entitled to medical care, is that truly thought provoking.

      • @drekly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        The UN deleted the tweet and deny that it actually happened. Yet these news articles ignore that. But that doesn’t match with your extremely biased view. Genocide apologist?

    • BarbecueCowboy
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      Hamas does occupy governmental positions, but they’re also demonstrably linked to terrorist actions which they take full responsibility for, and I think that takes precedence for most people. With that, many of us are reticent to call them a government.

      To your point though, if we can trust wikipedia and if I’m reading it correctly, the ministry of health in Gaza seems to also be under Hamas governance, so I’m not sure who else you’d deliver the foreign aid too.

      • @jet@hackertalks.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Man it would have been great if the UN’s cameras had been operating, but they were damaged in a airstrike. Which means the UN compound was air struck. It seems to be the bigger story here…

  • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Why weren’t the supplies properly secured? This was going to happen otherwise.

    Love all the downvotes from people who have no concept of opsec. Please keep making excuses for them.

    My goodness the hivemind has migrated. Pointing out a mistake is apparently a grave error.

      • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Like I said, not my fault you and so many others have no concept of opsec. Well done summing it up though.

        • @YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          122 years ago

          No, I was mocking you. Good job on absorbing that without acknowledging the fact you’re a laughing stock.

          • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The ignorant one is mocking me? What a concept. Quit wasting my time. The UN made a mistake and you and several others are crying that it was pointed out.

            You were also so thirsty for validation that you went through my posts and replied to a response from a different thread to a different person assuming it was you. So now you can also go fuck yourself.

              • @qfjp@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                *it is I, THE IGNORANT ONE!

                Heard it the same exact way when I was reading it.

    • Kbin_space_program
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      They were. If you had read the article, Hamas posed as government workers to gain access, and the security cameras that look over the compound were damaged in Israeli airstrikes.

    • NumbersCanBeFun
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Attacking supply lines is not a new tactic in war. I’m surprised they were not better prepared but the same could be said about the intel that could have prevented the attack in the first place.

      • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        The intel was Israel and they sat on it and let this happen.

        Hamas stealing supplies was expected. It has nothing to do with supply line attacks.

    • @jet@hackertalks.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      The supplies were not properly secured, with security systems, cameras, and fences because the compound which stored the supplies had airstrike damage.

      Who is more liable in the situation, it’s hard to say

  • @laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    There isn’t any indication that it was Hamas that stole the stuff? It just that people pretending to be the health authority stole stuff. Could’ve been some selfish asshole civilians who stole shit for themselves when they knew they were likely not priority for that aid.

  • @zephyreks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    “UNRWA received reports that yesterday a group of people with trucks purporting to be from the Ministry of Health of the de facto authorities in Gaza, removed fuel and medical equipment from the Agency’s compound in the Gaza City,”

    Given that Hamas is the de facto authority in Gaza, this cannot be Hamas lmfao

    Otherwise, Hamas made no effort to disguise who they were, which is even funnier

  • @laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Eh fuel and medicine doesn’t help Hamas kill more people. So who cares. And yeah they might use meds to patch up militants, but guess what, laws of war state that wounded soldiers are allowed medical help.

    • @bartimeo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Fuel absolutly helps to kill more people. And wounded soldiers are allowed medical help but those medicines were for the civilians.

        • squiblet
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          What’s my option to not pay taxes? Go on hunger strike and starve to death, or be thrown in prison by the IRS?

          • metaStatic
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            No one pays tax, they take tax. You can’t be held accountable for what your mugger spends your money on.

            That being said Charitable donations are tax deductible. My goal each year is to donate as much as the government takes in tax so I know they’re doing something good with my share at least. (Union dues may also be tax deductible)

        • Rikudou_Sage
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Don’t speak for others, please. I personally don’t fancy a lunatic deciding I should get a nuke dropped on me. If you want to be suicidal, do it without harming others. Or even better - get professional help.

    • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What the hell kind of shit take is this? This article has nothing to do with the US. As eager as you may be are (after checking post history you have a hardon for asshole comments about the US) to shit all over our government at every opportunity, this story isn’t one of them.