House investigators have obtained texts that allegedly show Rep. Matt Gaetz, in 2017, setting up a trip with a woman who a close associate had paid for sex, sources say.
This has nothing to do with the allegations about him fucking a 17-yo, who being less than 365-days from majority was hardly a “child”. Illegal and immoral? Of course, and add some more “immoral” on top. Child? Yeah, not really. I was fucking like a jack rabbit at 17.
As to that case, we got no witnesses. Joel Greenberg (same guy as in this story) was supposed to roll on Gaetz post-conviction. He did not. The woman involved started an OnlyFans site. Not a star prosecution witness, and on top of that, she refused.
THIS might be something we can nail him with. He’s my Congressman, I’ve been watching and waiting.
You seem to have some pretty concrete ideas about what our Esteemed Colleagues on the Right Side of the Aisle would accept, that I don’t think they would necessarily share.
It didn’t matter initially when it was a child, why would it matter now that it’s a woman instead?
Perhaps read the story next time?
This has nothing to do with the allegations about him fucking a 17-yo, who being less than 365-days from majority was hardly a “child”. Illegal and immoral? Of course, and add some more “immoral” on top. Child? Yeah, not really. I was fucking like a jack rabbit at 17.
As to that case, we got no witnesses. Joel Greenberg (same guy as in this story) was supposed to roll on Gaetz post-conviction. He did not. The woman involved started an OnlyFans site. Not a star prosecution witness, and on top of that, she refused.
THIS might be something we can nail him with. He’s my Congressman, I’ve been watching and waiting.
Because one is acceptable to the GQP. The other is not.
You seem to have some pretty concrete ideas about what our Esteemed Colleagues on the Right Side of the Aisle would accept, that I don’t think they would necessarily share.
edit: I’m saying they have loose morals 🙄